Home / Technology
OpenAI faces backlash over undisclosed funding for child safety group
Nonprofit leaders express 'grimy' feeling over misleading outreach for Parents & Kids Safe AI Act
OpenAI has come under intense scrutiny from child safety advocates after it was revealed that the tech giant secretly funded the Parents & Kids Safe AI Coalition.
According to reports from the San Francisco Standard and The Times of India published on Wednesday, several nonprofit leaders only discovered OpenAI’s involvement after the coalition made its public debut.
The group had reportedly reached out to various organisations in March 2026, seeking endorsements for "core policy principles" without disclosing that OpenAI lawyers had formed the political action committee in January.
"It’s a very grimy feeling," one nonprofit leader stated, describing the outreach emails as "pretty misleading." At least two members have since resigned from the coalition in protest.
The controversy centres on allegations of "astroturfing"—the practice of masking corporate sponsorship to make a message appear as a grassroots movement.
The coalition’s proposals, which include age verification and independent safety audits, closely mirror the Parents & Kids Safe AI Act, a California ballot initiative jointly filed by OpenAI and Common Sense Media in January 2026.
Critics, including Josh Golin, the Executive Director of FairPlay, have accused OpenAI of attempting to "write its own rulebook" while creating market demand for biometric products owned by CEO Sam Altman.
"I want them to get out of the way and let advocates and parents pass the legislation they think is best for kids," Golin remarked.
Despite the backlash, OpenAI and remaining coalition members maintain they are "fighting for the strongest child AI safety law in the nation."
This development follows a year of increased tension between Silicon Valley and safety advocates over the "addictive" nature of generative AI.
While OpenAI has pledged $10 million to promote its safety act, the global community remains divided on whether tech corporations can be trusted to regulate the very tools they profit from.
